Revenue Diagnostic
A 2-week assessment to find missed revenue opportunities and the next best growth levers.
- Revenue and channel audit
- Priority map and executive readout
Best fit Leaders who know revenue is leaking but cannot name where.
For companies whose growth outran their revenue engine. Most stalled growth is not a lead problem or a closing problem. It is a structure problem, and structure is what I fix.
Revenue growth is a systems problem. More headcount just makes the system more expensive.
A 2-week assessment to find missed revenue opportunities and the next best growth levers.
Best fit Leaders who know revenue is leaking but cannot name where.
A 4–6 week sprint to design the right revenue motion and a plan the team can execute.
Best fit Leaders with a target who need the motion designed before spending on it.
I build the channel and run it with you, month over month: sourcing partners, structuring the deals, and getting them producing revenue. Most companies I work with have nobody who owns this yet.
Best fit Leaders with no one who owns partnerships today.
Most companies start with the Revenue Diagnostic.
| Shape | Best fit | You end up with | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Start here Revenue Diagnostic | 2-week fixed engagement | Leaders who suspect revenue is leaking but cannot name where it is happening | An opportunity map and executive readout: the problem named and prioritized |
| Then Growth Design Sprint | 4 to 6 week fixed engagement | Leaders who know the target and need the motion designed before spending on it | A commercial model, targeting, and a 90-day roadmap the team can execute |
| Retained Retained Partnership Leadership | Monthly retainer, 6-month minimum | Leaders with no one who owns partnerships, who need it built and run | Partners signed and producing revenue, and a team trained to run it |
Each engagement stands on its own. Most companies work through them in order, but you can start anywhere and stop anywhere. The free 30-minute discovery call comes first either way, and it is where we figure out which one is the right fit and what it costs.
No pitch. We talk through where revenue is being missed, what is likely causing it, and whether there is a reason to go further.
A structured engine powers the work, and the value stays with you:
Find the revenue opportunities that deserve attention before the team wastes time on weak targets.
Explore module →Build the business case from the other side's incentives instead of leading with your product story.
Explore module →Design the commercial structure, economics, and ownership logic before the contract starts lying for you.
Explore module →Turn signed agreements into live channels with activation logic that survives product, legal, and GTM friction.
Explore module →Pressure-test the economic case so the channel can survive finance review, not just CEO enthusiasm.
Explore module →Map where leverage sits in the market and where non-obvious revenue opportunities can compound faster.
Explore module →Build the internal story that keeps the revenue motion funded, protected, and understood by leadership.
Explore module →Use AI where it sharpens signal, speed, and decision quality instead of turning the work into shiny nonsense.
Explore module →Real operating outcomes from prior engagements, documented with scope, impact, and what changed inside the business.
Scaled partnership revenue from $300K to $40M ARR, built a 15-person cross-functional tiger team, and turned partnerships into the second-largest revenue stream.
Review case study →Led a payment infrastructure overhaul that reduced fees by 18 percent, improved checkout conversion by 12 percent, and unlocked more than $4M in incremental revenue.
Review case study →Practical thinking for CEOs, founders, and revenue leaders on stalled growth, partnership economics, and the execution realities that make or break the BD function.
The most expensive mistake post-Series A founders make: hiring a senior sales leader to run a machine that does not exist yet. Fix the channel engine first, then hire the army.
Read on LinkedIn →Hiring an expensive sales leader before you have a repeatable way to generate demand is one of the fastest ways to burn a round. Build the system, then hire the people to run it.
Read on LinkedIn →Skip the vendor fiction about 85% cost savings. A real business case is partner CAC 34% lower than paid media and LTV up 44%: numbers you can run through a model and defend to the board.
Read on LinkedIn →It is a structured service business powered by a proprietary system. Buyers engage for outcomes, support, and implementation. They do not buy a transferable product license.
Clients receive the outputs, recommendations, plans, and live support generated through PROS. They do not receive the underlying trade secret, prompt architecture, or internal decision logic as a transferable asset.
Usually right alongside them. A VP of Sales owns a quota and a team. Partner-sourced revenue is a different motion with different economics, a longer ramp, and dependencies across product, legal, and finance that no sales leader has time to run on top of the number. I build that motion so it hands off cleanly to the team that already exists. If your VP of Sales is the person who should own it long term, then the work is to get it stood up and transferred to them, and I will say so.
Then I tell you that, on the discovery call if it is already clear or at the end of the Revenue Diagnostic if it takes real work to establish. It happens. Some companies have a pricing problem, a retention problem, or a positioning problem wearing a partnerships costume, and bolting a channel onto it makes the underlying issue more expensive. I take no referral fees and I do not sell software, so there is nothing pushing the recommendation toward a bigger engagement. A short, clear no is a better outcome for both of us than a project that cannot work.
When revenue growth feels slower than it should, when channels are not compounding, when deals stall after initial excitement, or when internal teams disagree on where growth should come from next. The call is free and there is no obligation attached to it. It is 30 minutes to establish what the problem is and whether I am the right person for it.
Yes. That is often the right setup. The work is designed to complement existing product, finance, GTM, and leadership teams rather than pretend one advisor can replace all of them.
No pitch. A direct conversation about the revenue growth problem in front of you, what is likely causing it, and which engagement makes sense if there is a fit. Paid work starts only after this call, once we both know what we are solving.